| Author | Post |
|---|
Gloriana
Administrator
| Joined: | Thu Nov 24th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 122 |
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22nd, 2007 09:16 pm |
|
What is White European Culture?
http://www.gossiping.net/phpBB2/?mforum=newsboard
Antimulticulture
September 14th, 2006
The chances are that if at some stage you openly declare that
you wish to "protect white European culture, traditions and
values" as I have, you will be asked by a leftist, with a
dismissive tone and a smug air of self-congratulation, to define
what you mean by "white European culture". Our internationalist,
open-borders Marxist friend will sit back and wait, thinking he
has another "evil racist" he can denounce at will in his sights.
So let us give him an answer, right now.
Culture is what makes up our society; it is our history, our
politics, our flag, our people, our identity, our sports and our
music, our holidays, our food, our legal system, our quaint
coloured buses, and taxi's and the legends, tales and myths that
get passed down from generation to generation and on and on and
on....
Of course our Marxist friend won't accept that. His likely
rhetorical comeback is that France and Poland for example are
both white but are vastly different, but we can tell him that
merely reinforces the idea that white societies are diverse in
their own right, even between regions of the same nation there
are vast differences, but that still doesn't prove white culture
doesn't exist as he was indoctrinated at the thought-collective
to believe.
Of course, white cultures have overlapped throughout time. Would
a "multiculturalist" expect otherwise? Do they think the nations
of Europe were vacuum sealed? For example, the Normans
originally from Scandinavia, took control of Western France,
then took control of most of Britain and as such their dynasty
set up a great deal of commonality and political thinking in the
language we have today, but it is still an example white culture.
His next question will likely be, but why is it deemed "white
culture"? To which we answer that until very recently,
uncoincidentally about the same time as "multiculturalism" was
invented, Europe, the United States and most of the Commonwealth
countries were deemed to have a dominant white host culture,
it's people were (and in a 99.9% of cases still are, for now)
majority white. Naturally there were always small populations of
different races, the Asians in Australia and the United States
during the gold rushes for example never thought they had
entered into a "multicultural" society and it was never
suggested that it was.
Also prior to the "multicultural" experiment being implemented
Australian immigration policy was based on the idea of
compatibility, people from post-war Europe were encouraged to
settle. These people were different in culture but deliberately
chosen for their white, Christian outlook.
Likewise the United States Civil War which cost the lives of 10
million young Americans, was not fought against "racists" to
free the "oppressed blacks", it was fought to preserve states
rights from creeping federalism, one of the sub-plots was the
issue of slavery. When war came blacks served willingly with
Southern as well as Northern forces. For some the security of
guaranteed work on the plantation during hard times, overrode
the need to be "free". Nevertheless "free" the blacks became
when the South lost, but it wasn't until the 1960's, some 100
years after the civil war, that the idea of American society
dominated by whites was challenged. It was during that period
that America lost it's sense of cultural identity. Nowadays The
United States is inundated with Mexicans who have their own
sense of cultural awareness which is unashamedly celebrated by
mainstream politicians.
I put it to the multiculturalists who still don't believe whites
have a traditional culture, as absurd an argument as that sounds
on its own, that if we were to jump in a time machine and visit
a famous figure up until the late 1960's, when the
"multicultural" experiment truly kicked off, and tell them that
Western Europe would have such a large percentage of non-white
or even Islamic immigrants within their borders we'd have been
laughed out of the era.
But that is what "multiculturalism" is. In essence, there is no
host culture. Abdul the Muslim has an equal say in how
traditionally white, Christian France should be ordered as
Pierre the non-muslim. No longer is there a need to assimilate
into the aforementioned host white culture - it really is code
for "cultural free for all".
This is an important point because, it **HAS** to be remembered
that Islam is it's own culture and like a parasite it uses the
host as nourishment then abandons it when it is has no further
use for it. Our societies are going the same way, assaulted on
all sides by the third world and the subversive left who think
"culture" can be manufactured or changed on a whim like the
meaningless new South African flag, in typical "year-zero"
fashion.
Unfortunately, ordinary people are stuck between being called a
"racist" and telling the truth about who they are, that they
will deny their own sense of self and cut themselves off from
their natural community. Akin to giving up a career as a
teacher, coach or carer whose job it is to look after children
for fear you will be accused of being a paedophile. Such is the
weight one little word has gained over the years. Never let it
be said that Commie-style "denouncing" doesn't work.
So why is it so important that we remain white?
Firstly, this is our society. If we lose this we have no other
to flee to. There is no point jumping on boats and trying to go
to Egypt or Somalia for example. Because despite the "noble
savage" rhetoric you hear from leftists, as the infidel we will
either be slaughtered or enslaved in true dhimmi fashion.
Secondly, white society is the only one that can merge democracy
and creativity with fair play, freedom and law.
The Japanese are often put up as the closest parallel to white
society and for all their achievements, mostly through massive
American investment after WW2, their methods of strict
discipline, historical cruelty without remorse, their corrupt
politics and *their* inflexible and unchallenged definition of
what it means to be Japanese, ensures that they can never play
on the world stage to the extent whites have. They simply don't
have the respect.
These Chinese also, supposedly an emerging force in the world do
not have the tradition of free society that whites nations do,
what they offer is cheap manufacturing. The Arab/Islamic
countries have no expertise in creating societies and as such
offer the world nothing, even today their wealth cannot buy
engineering know-how that is provided by... guess which group of
people?
In short, take white people out of the equation and the
power-vacuum that will occur, will not be worth sticking around
for.
So, we don't need to feel ashamed to be white especially in our
own countries, we don't need permission to be proud to be white,
and we certainly don't need to commit cultural suicide in the
process to "ease" the globalist lefts self-loathing.
|
Current time is 03:55 am | |
|
|
|