| Moderated by: Gloriana, Antimulticulture | ||
| Author | Post | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gloriana Administrator 
|
What is White European Culture? http://www.gossiping.net/phpBB2/?mforum=newsboard Antimulticulture September 14th, 2006 The chances are that if at some stage you openly declare that you wish to "protect white European culture, traditions and values" as I have, you will be asked by a leftist, with a dismissive tone and a smug air of self-congratulation, to define what you mean by "white European culture". Our internationalist, open-borders Marxist friend will sit back and wait, thinking he has another "evil racist" he can denounce at will in his sights. So let us give him an answer, right now. Culture is what makes up our society; it is our history, our politics, our flag, our people, our identity, our sports and our music, our holidays, our food, our legal system, our quaint coloured buses, and taxi's and the legends, tales and myths that get passed down from generation to generation and on and on and on.... Of course our Marxist friend won't accept that. His likely rhetorical comeback is that France and Poland for example are both white but are vastly different, but we can tell him that merely reinforces the idea that white societies are diverse in their own right, even between regions of the same nation there are vast differences, but that still doesn't prove white culture doesn't exist as he was indoctrinated at the thought-collective to believe. Of course, white cultures have overlapped throughout time. Would a "multiculturalist" expect otherwise? Do they think the nations of Europe were vacuum sealed? For example, the Normans originally from Scandinavia, took control of Western France, then took control of most of Britain and as such their dynasty set up a great deal of commonality and political thinking in the language we have today, but it is still an example white culture. His next question will likely be, but why is it deemed "white culture"? To which we answer that until very recently, uncoincidentally about the same time as "multiculturalism" was invented, Europe, the United States and most of the Commonwealth countries were deemed to have a dominant white host culture, it's people were (and in a 99.9% of cases still are, for now) majority white. Naturally there were always small populations of different races, the Asians in Australia and the United States during the gold rushes for example never thought they had entered into a "multicultural" society and it was never suggested that it was. Also prior to the "multicultural" experiment being implemented Australian immigration policy was based on the idea of compatibility, people from post-war Europe were encouraged to settle. These people were different in culture but deliberately chosen for their white, Christian outlook. Likewise the United States Civil War which cost the lives of 10 million young Americans, was not fought against "racists" to free the "oppressed blacks", it was fought to preserve states rights from creeping federalism, one of the sub-plots was the issue of slavery. When war came blacks served willingly with Southern as well as Northern forces. For some the security of guaranteed work on the plantation during hard times, overrode the need to be "free". Nevertheless "free" the blacks became when the South lost, but it wasn't until the 1960's, some 100 years after the civil war, that the idea of American society dominated by whites was challenged. It was during that period that America lost it's sense of cultural identity. Nowadays The United States is inundated with Mexicans who have their own sense of cultural awareness which is unashamedly celebrated by mainstream politicians. I put it to the multiculturalists who still don't believe whites have a traditional culture, as absurd an argument as that sounds on its own, that if we were to jump in a time machine and visit a famous figure up until the late 1960's, when the "multicultural" experiment truly kicked off, and tell them that Western Europe would have such a large percentage of non-white or even Islamic immigrants within their borders we'd have been laughed out of the era. But that is what "multiculturalism" is. In essence, there is no host culture. Abdul the Muslim has an equal say in how traditionally white, Christian France should be ordered as Pierre the non-muslim. No longer is there a need to assimilate into the aforementioned host white culture - it really is code for "cultural free for all". This is an important point because, it **HAS** to be remembered that Islam is it's own culture and like a parasite it uses the host as nourishment then abandons it when it is has no further use for it. Our societies are going the same way, assaulted on all sides by the third world and the subversive left who think "culture" can be manufactured or changed on a whim like the meaningless new South African flag, in typical "year-zero" fashion. Unfortunately, ordinary people are stuck between being called a "racist" and telling the truth about who they are, that they will deny their own sense of self and cut themselves off from their natural community. Akin to giving up a career as a teacher, coach or carer whose job it is to look after children for fear you will be accused of being a paedophile. Such is the weight one little word has gained over the years. Never let it be said that Commie-style "denouncing" doesn't work. So why is it so important that we remain white? Firstly, this is our society. If we lose this we have no other to flee to. There is no point jumping on boats and trying to go to Egypt or Somalia for example. Because despite the "noble savage" rhetoric you hear from leftists, as the infidel we will either be slaughtered or enslaved in true dhimmi fashion. Secondly, white society is the only one that can merge democracy and creativity with fair play, freedom and law. The Japanese are often put up as the closest parallel to white society and for all their achievements, mostly through massive American investment after WW2, their methods of strict discipline, historical cruelty without remorse, their corrupt politics and *their* inflexible and unchallenged definition of what it means to be Japanese, ensures that they can never play on the world stage to the extent whites have. They simply don't have the respect. These Chinese also, supposedly an emerging force in the world do not have the tradition of free society that whites nations do, what they offer is cheap manufacturing. The Arab/Islamic countries have no expertise in creating societies and as such offer the world nothing, even today their wealth cannot buy engineering know-how that is provided by... guess which group of people? In short, take white people out of the equation and the power-vacuum that will occur, will not be worth sticking around for. So, we don't need to feel ashamed to be white especially in our own countries, we don't need permission to be proud to be white, and we certainly don't need to commit cultural suicide in the process to "ease" the globalist lefts self-loathing. |
|||||||